| | |
View Poll Results: Do u agree that jlo would have been better then xtina? | |
YES
|   | 10 | 20.83% | |
no
|   | 32 | 66.67% | |
who cares?
|   | 6 | 12.50% |
08-31-2003, 08:26 AM
|
#31 | | at night i pray...
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: canada
Posts: 1,194
| Well actually, yes I think j.lo would of been better, but I didn't care because I only payed attention to Brit and Madonna  . |
| |
08-31-2003, 12:06 PM
|
#32 | | ^ yep
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: ISRAEL
Posts: 7,158
| Quote: Originally posted by WhatItsLike2Bme
LMFAO WtF!?!? | Well he's right. No one actually gives a shit about Christina. Or at least Christina's kiss  HAHAHA it's so funny though. |
| |
08-31-2003, 12:21 PM
|
#33 | | World Champion
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Chicago
Posts: 14,739
| Yeah no one... The only reason britney's was bigger was because it was first, not to mention christina's wasn't focused on as far as the camera goes.
But no you're right it's a sign of her loosing popularity  |
| |
08-31-2003, 02:40 PM
|
#34 | | buffy is cookie dough
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,714
| i think britney and christina work. like madonna, most probably thought britney would just have one album and be a young pop star with no future in the business. and christina is the other young pop star who's the biggest next to britney out right now. also, they "feud" between britney and christina make the performance bigger. |
| |
08-31-2003, 05:23 PM
|
#35 | | June 27th
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Right Behind You.
Posts: 20,416
| It would be interesting to see what the J-Lo version would be like, but I have to say, Christina did the job quite well. Putting J-Lo in there would've been like putting a peice into a jigsaw puzzle that looks like it fits, and it loosely fits, but the right peice (Christina) would've been eaten by the cat if it hadn't been put in there.
J-Lo would've lipsanc, I really liked Christina's voice. And I absolutely loved the way Christina came waltzing around that cake. I dont know what it was about it, but I just thought it was so cool. I think the camera angle and the way she waved her bouquet just fit perfectly.
However, I get the feeling that J-Lo's veil would've stayed hanging infront of her face a little longer. Christina had to lift hers up so soon because there was no mistaking that voice. Britney's wasn't very distinguishable, so she was able to hold of the "surprise" a little longer, as would have J-Lo. But I liked how as soon as she said "like a virgin" you KNEW it was Christina.
But, I'd definitely stay with Christina. The fact that it was Britney and Christina makes way more sense than Britney and J-Lo. Simply because you've basically got the royal family. And although J-Ho is popular, she is no where NEAR the royal family of pop divas. Or any generation of royality for that matter.
Good topic though. I was waiting for this, and was about to make it myself. |
| |
08-31-2003, 07:20 PM
|
#36 | | Shawn<3 7-22-03
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Orange Country, Calif
Posts: 4,346
| I dont care really, it was good just seeing Madonna and Britney singing together! |
| |
08-31-2003, 09:56 PM
|
#37 | | Alex
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: M-I-A
Posts: 4,796
| They both would have rocked  |
| |
08-31-2003, 10:19 PM
|
#38 | | Wish You Were Here
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Covington, Louisiana
Posts: 2,298
| J. Lo wold have definitely been better. Better eye candy!  |
| |
08-31-2003, 11:01 PM
|
#39 | | + Holy is the Lamb
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: God's Army
Posts: 4,692
| J.Lo was keen to run away from it. My God, Madonna has the Star Power, Britney has the looks to dtop traffic, Christina's vocal ability shakes the house with soul...and then there'd a been J.Hoe. She does in no shape or form fit next to Madonna, she's stuck-up, a biatch, not the right style, and ain't pretty enough to stand next to britney or madonna. Chrissy fit the part perfectly and haw rude are ya'll for dissin' on Chrissy like this, she's awesome and you're jealous and dang you gotta be nicer. Christina was not forgotten at all, in fact she was probably paid more attention to since she was J.lo's replacement. Not alot of people knew who it was gonna be. and it was perfect...shoot best VMA performance EVER!!! |
| |
09-01-2003, 04:51 AM
|
#40 | | ^ yep
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: ISRAEL
Posts: 7,158
| Quote: Originally posted by WhatItsLike2Bme Yeah no one... The only reason britney's was bigger was because it was first, not to mention christina's wasn't focused on as far as the camera goes. | No. Christina didn't became less popular.. she just stayed the way she was and that wasn't SO popular like Brit. If Christina kissed Madonna first, I think articles would show both pics but no way they'll take Britney's pic out. And the Britney kiss was almost as long as the Christina one, even though they cut some of Christina's kiss, you could see the kiss with Britney was hotter. Christina looked like she was.... straight. LMFAO it is not a bad thing but the Britney and Madonna kiss was so lesbian.... hehe. AND you are NOT going to deny most of the world prefers seeing Britney being dirrrrty than Christina. Like... she is considered sexier or whatever. |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0 | |