Carlos_ea

That many songs might be "normal" for other artists but not for our lil Brit. She'd have to dance her ass off with a setlist like yours. I think she'd call it quits after the first 10 shows, if not less. lol

__________________

Adams

that's why she has days off, to relax , plus, if she could dance less and sing more, it'd be more entertaining, cuz you can't do that both at the same time, I prefer her to sing live than to do dance, cuz that's why ppl don't take her seriously, cuz she's not proving herself as a musician (sp?), that's what musicians do, they sing

Nanny

Thats where you're wrong. She really doesn't HAVE to dance. She just chooses too. And besides, when you're on stage like that, your adrenaline goes so much that you'd be able to perform fifty songs, dancing full-out and not be tired... That is, if you're actually in it for the proper reasons.

Carlos_ea

Sure, it would be GREAT to see her sing live and all, but it would be just like christina (nothing against her, just providing the most obvious example), lots of singing + little to no dancing = boredom I'd rather see her dance her ass-off and keep us entertained (or me at least, for all I care).




I bet the adrenaline flows for at first, but just like everything else, it becomes tiring. Just like in theather plays, actors/actresses get tired of doing the same over and over again (I would know ), no matter how much you like doing what you do, you get tired, it's only human.

__________________

Nanny

You'd really be amazed.

Adams

not really, cuz her Stripped concert was really good, Britney won't be considered as a musician or singer anymore if she doesnt prove the people that she can do it when she can, if not, she's only an entertainer and that's why circus are for, to entertain, cuz even on Brodway shows, the sing and dance

Nanny

No it wasn't. Not the London one anyways. It was actually quite boring. BUT, Britney can cut (most of) the dancing and still produce an amazing show. She's got dancers to do the dancing for her, she can do a few hip thrusts and such here and there. She can choreograph her moves and her walk and whatnot to give it an extra kick. She can use pyro and other visual effects to kick the entertainment aspect up a notch. And of course dance for choruses and things. But she doesn't have to be so hardcore with her dancing. I mean, in MATM on TRL she had a live mic and there were parts where she screamed and gasped because the moves just cant be done without making those noises. She can save those kinds of moves for dance breaks. Another way to liven it up, is have interludes where Britney does a lot of dancing, but when its time to sing, she brings it down a few notches.

She can produce an interesting show, sing live and dance alll in one show, she just needs to learn how to split them up.

Carlos_ea

Agreed.

__________________

Oejjej

lol, you're probably right, that's funny, you made me laugh

I think one of the worst medleys I have heard was from Nelly at the Grammy Awards I think last year

and he did Hot In Here & Dilemma, and at the end they had these little holes for these female dancers and like it went from "a little uh-uh blah blah blah" (HIH) to "No matter what I do all I think about is you" (Dilemma) and back to "a little uh-uh blah blah blah" and it just went back and forth with these short clips of both songs, it was horrible, horrible

so I agree medleys should be well put together, like the VMA 2000 was an awesome medley and so was BMA/EMA, but I think the Music Box Medley seemed really stupid, just because I think the moment people got into the song, it changed into another

plus anyone who shortens BTMYH in any way is the devil himself

Joe

Carlos_ea

OMG. I saw that. was like WTF!? It sounded like a 12 year old made it be recordin with a cd to and a tape in his stereo lol.

so true

__________________