Michael Jackson Found NOT GUILTY - Page 6 - Eternal Allegiance

Lenghthen · 06-15-2005, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Stinger
And so the million dollar question pops up. What parent in their right mind would let their kids play at Jackson's Neverland? How is it possible that such can happen TWICE? What KIND of parent would send their kids out there?

Out there... where the money's at... Out there.

"Yes, yes, that's awesome, go play with Michael, yes yes... "

Whether or not the man is guilty of actually doing this stuff, the rumours have been there for years. I'm fairly sure Ash (can I call you Ash? It saves me typing ) that those things you're talking about have been brought up in court too. The question is, how guilty is he in relation to the parents themselves?

There's a high probability that Jackson to jail means parents to jail too. Which is bad for the future of the kids. And as the saying goes, the past is the past, the future is what it's all about, all parties go free, Jackson's already gotten his punishment, and there's no chance of him nailing any kids again, since every breathing soul knows about what might be going on up there.

No need to put the sign in his yard anymore. "Enter at own risk", if you catch my drift.

Oh, and yes I do blame the parents. I guess their intention is to get money from a millionaire no matter what happens to their child. And that my friend, is DISGUSTING. To put your own child in danger because of money is really pathetic. So don't get me wrong, I definitely blame the parents as well. Like you said, money talks.

And yes, you can call me Ash.

Can I call you Er instead of Stinger? Okay, lame joke.

I tried, though.

ManSlippers · 06-15-2005, 12:52 PM

I LOVE YOU ASSLEIGH<33333333 AND I AGREE!!!! But, I still don't think he's a danger to anyone.

Duffyboy · 06-15-2005, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ashleigh
[BIf people don't find this stuff weird and nasty, then you have problems. Sorry, but you do. [/b]

Yeah I do find it weird and nasty. That TWO people can lie and TWICE he ends up in trouble for soemthing he nas never done and has no (thank God) been aquitted of.

Oh btw, Is Jay-Z really hitting that woman in your sig?.....

Lenghthen · 06-15-2005, 01:33 PM

How do you know he didn't do anything? Has he told you that personally? That's what I was trying to convey to everyone. And yes, I don't know personally if he actually molested children, but it does make me think that it's true when he was arrested twice for it. That's all I meant by it.

And yes, Jay-Z is really hitting that woman.

Duffyboy · 06-15-2005, 01:38 PM

Naughty boy.

Lenghthen · 06-15-2005, 01:48 PM

It's hilarious, though.

FantaOrSprite · 06-16-2005, 09:18 AM

I knew he'd get off. I found the whole thing fishy. They should have waited for some harder evidance and not jumped on that kid's story. Or at least got their effing facts straight first.

I agree with Allie and Ash. I think the man is guilty of SOMETHING. Maybe not what they accused him of this time, but I do believe in my heart he has done something to some little boy somewhere. Yeah, because I pay people 20 million dollars for a crime I never committed. That just screams innocent to me!

I watched that special on him where he was talking about sharing his bed with kids. ......SICK SICK SICK. Worst of all were the parents who LET their children into the home of an alleged child molester. And you know their eyes were on the green. Sad world.

I know people are going to be like "HE WAS PROVEN INNOCENT SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE". Well a forum is a place to express your opinions. And I"m expressing mine. Something about this whole thing just seems fishy to me. God don't let any other children around him please. Let the parents have that much sense.

Birgerhar · 06-16-2005, 09:24 AM

Don't you hate it when even when your innocent all the signs and evidence points that you are guilty? Don't tell me you've never been in a situation close to that. Even though you did not do anything, it seems very surely that you did.

Duffyboy · 06-16-2005, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RaInBoW_bRiTe
I knew he'd get off. I found the whole thing fishy. They should have waited for some harder evidance and not jumped on that kid's story. Or at least got their effing facts straight first.

I agree with Allie and Ash. I think the man is guilty of SOMETHING. Maybe not what they accused him of this time, but I do believe in my heart he has done something to some little boy somewhere. Yeah, because I pay people 20 million dollars for a crime I never committed. That just screams innocent to me!

I watched that special on him where he was talking about sharing his bed with kids. ......SICK SICK SICK. Worst of all were the parents who LET their children into the home of an alleged child molester. And you know their eyes were on the green. Sad world.

I know people are going to be like "HE WAS PROVEN INNOCENT SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE". Well a forum is a place to express your opinions. And I"m expressing mine. Something about this whole thing just seems fishy to me. God don't let any other children around him please. Let the parents have that much sense.

So let's get this straight, he's just been found innocent, but yet you say he HAS to be guilty of something? What imaginary offense is he guilty of.

ENLIGHTEN ME!

ManSlippers · 06-16-2005, 09:34 AM

^^ It is better to remain silent and have your intelligence questioned, than to speak and remove all doubt.