| |
10-01-2003, 05:41 PM
|
#41 | | Somebodys Watching...
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 7,803
| Can you give me the quotes from the Bible because it doesn't say anything about him physically baptizing, it just says who he does it to. I'm willing to wait.
Plus, can you still get in contact with your cousin from "Stigmata"? |
| |
10-01-2003, 05:53 PM
|
#42 | | World Champion
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,345
| If he baptized people, it is common sense that he had to do it physically, how else do you think he did it?
O woops I just read the verses I was going to show you and I was wrong I guess John baptized Jesus. Woops see it is better to study it for yourself.
Paul still baptized people though and he is saying there that it wasn't done in his name it was done in Jesus' name. Read the King James versions 1st Corinthians chapter one. I dont know how different that one you have is.
I don't like to talk about them much I probably shouldn't even have said that. |
| |
10-01-2003, 05:57 PM
|
#43 | | Somebodys Watching...
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 7,803
| Ok, but i was telling you that because the Bible has so many contradictions, that still doesn't un-contradict (?) the statements that i made. It's still in the Bible. How can those mistakes be inspired of God?
About the cousins, ok, i guess i shouldn't but in. |
| |
10-01-2003, 05:58 PM
|
#44 | | World Champion
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,345
| What is the mistake it's not a mistake. I just told you what it meant. |
| |
10-01-2003, 06:14 PM
|
#45 | | World Champion
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,345
| Hey look what I just found the whole king James version is online check it out if ya want to http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?ver...JV&passage=all
O yeah the Original scrolls were not only Arabic there may have been some but it was Hebrew and Greek too I'm not sure if there was Arabic too but if there was it wasn't only that I know that.
Last edited by MX3 : 10-01-2003 at 06:17 PM.
|
| |
10-01-2003, 06:19 PM
|
#46 | | Somebodys Watching...
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 7,803
| I never said they were Arabic, i said they were Aromaic. The original scripture of the Bible was COMPLETELY written in Aromaic. I know that for a fact, my teacher (whos a christian) said the same, and he has ALOT of knowledge.
The Qur'ans original form is Arabic. I'll check that site out.  |
| |
10-01-2003, 06:22 PM
|
#47 | | World Champion
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,345
| Quote: Originally posted by Britneyslave I never said they were Arabic, i said they were Aromaic. The original scripture of the Bible was COMPLETELY written in Aromaic. I know that for a fact, my teacher (whos a christian) said the same, and he has ALOT of knowledge.
The Qur'ans original form is Arabic. I'll check that site out. | I am gonna check into that then also
Im going to play the sims now k lol. 
Last edited by MX3 : 10-01-2003 at 06:40 PM.
|
| |
10-01-2003, 06:58 PM
|
#48 | | Somebodys Watching...
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 7,803
| lol, ok. But that doesn't make sense to me. There are like 72 versions of the Bible and they're making even more ones. Alot of them are different. And when you change words, they loose their meaning also. So, how do you even know that what you're reading as close to correct? By them changing the meaning all the time is evidence that the Bible is changed and incorrect. |
| |
10-01-2003, 07:00 PM
|
#49 | | World Champion
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,345
| I just found that out and it wasnt all Aromaic. Here is what it was...
The Old Testament was written in Hebrew: the language of the Israelites. The New Testament was written in Greek and Aramaic. |
| |
10-01-2003, 07:03 PM
|
#50 | | World Champion
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,345
| Quote: Originally posted by Britneyslave lol, ok. But that doesn't make sense to me. There are like 72 versions of the Bible and they're making even more ones. Alot of them are different. And when you change words, they loose their meaning also. So, how do you even know that what you're reading as close to correct? By them changing the meaning all the time is evidence that the Bible is changed and incorrect. | They still have the original version with the original Languages it was written in. The way they were messed up was in the translation ... the King James Version isn't perfect but it is the closest one that there is. You can study that and then take certain words back to the original language and figure it out. They have the original language one still I forgot what it is called though. I will try to figure out where to get it again. I heard once but I forgot.
The Pastor at www.shepherdschapel.com has read and learned both that is why I like listening to him he can always let ya know when there is a mistake and take it back to the Original for you.
Last edited by MX3 : 10-01-2003 at 07:13 PM.
|
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:33 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0 | |