| |
03-01-2005, 08:04 PM
|
#51 | | World Champion
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,606
|
Quote: Originally posted by CrAZyBeAuTiFuL4
She'll have to make it through preliminaries first though...keep that in mind  | Thats true, but for her it seems like shes already won. When A LOT people ask you to run for office, its most likely you'll win the primaries and caucuses. But yeah, that process is still there! lol. | 
|  | |
03-01-2005, 08:25 PM
|
#52 | | Scrum-Tiddly-Umptious
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: The STL
Posts: 5,678
|
Quote: Originally posted by Possum
You're saying that like thats all I live for.. to vote against democrats. I dont vote for a democrat because they are a democrats, I vote against them if i don't agree with them. I'll vote for a democrat when I agree. It just so happens that I tend agree with republicans more. Its not my fault. Theres Nothing wrong with that. | There IS something wrong with saying you won't vote for someone when you don't even know what her running stance will be, what platforms she'll agree with and support,and which she'll be against. In fact I find it ignorant to not investigate all possible candidates and just vote for whatever party you like, regardless of candidate. | |
| | |
03-01-2005, 08:52 PM
|
#53 | | World Champion
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,606
|
Quote: Originally posted by RaInBoW_bRiTe
There IS something wrong with saying you won't vote for someone when you don't even know what her running stance will be, what platforms she'll agree with and support,and which she'll be against. In fact I find it ignorant to not investigate all possible candidates and just vote for whatever party you like, regardless of candidate. | I'll study her.. just not now. Later on! Plus, if the republican is bad, I'll prolly vote for her or not vote at all. But Im sure I'll like the Republican. | |
| | |
03-02-2005, 06:33 AM
|
#54 | | John 6:44-47 (NIV)
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: i rep the 'pep' in va
Posts: 12,651
|
From the way Hillary has been, she pretty much has divided the country in half on how we take to her...some thinks she's too liberal and some don't.
In the article, it does sound like they're singing her praises, already. | |
| | |
03-03-2005, 08:43 AM
|
#55 | | Finlay Benoit Carlito
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: A
Posts: 2,079
|
Quote: Originally posted by Jess
Don't just vote for/against her because she's a democrat. | We need to get rid of the admin that's wrecking the country. Personally someone like Hillary is good enough to do that I feel. BTW, Who is the Republican to take over if the buggers sneak their way in again? Cheny? | |
| | |
03-03-2005, 12:35 PM
|
#56 | | SAN JOSE STATE!!!!!
Join Date: May 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 6,802
|
Who knows. I'm not saying one is better than the other, I'm just saying don't just vote for her JUST because she's a democrat. She isn't, but if she were an idiot don't just vote for her to kick out any Republican. The person you want to kick out isn't even going to be there. If both are idiots pick someone else. Sure they may not win, but at least you didn't sink down. | |
| | |
03-03-2005, 01:12 PM
|
#57 | | Finlay Benoit Carlito
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: A
Posts: 2,079
|
Quote: Originally posted by Jess
Who knows. I'm not saying one is better than the other, I'm just saying don't just vote for her JUST because she's a democrat. She isn't, but if she were an idiot don't just vote for her to kick out any Republican. The person you want to kick out isn't even going to be there. If both are idiots pick someone else. Sure they may not win, but at least you didn't sink down. | Suppose so, I just feel Hillary may have more experience. And knows the tricks of the trade.
BTW, I read that Roosevelt was elected FOUR times. If so is it still possible *please God* for Clinton to do the same? | |
| | |
03-03-2005, 01:52 PM
|
#58 | | Mraz-a-licious
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Iowa City @ U of I
Posts: 6,875
|
Quote: Originally posted by Duffyboy
Suppose so, I just feel Hillary may have more experience. And knows the tricks of the trade.
BTW, I read that Roosevelt was elected FOUR times. If so is it still possible *please God* for Clinton to do the same? | He was elected 4 times and then they made a rule that says no president can serve more than 2 terms. Clinton has served 2 terms. Unfortunately. | |
| | |
03-03-2005, 03:59 PM
|
#59 | | World Champion
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,606
|
Quote: Originally posted by Duffyboy
Suppose so, I just feel Hillary may have more experience. And knows the tricks of the trade.
BTW, I read that Roosevelt was elected FOUR times. If so is it still possible *please God* for Clinton to do the same? | That was from the 1920s to the 1940s. There is a new amendment law in the Constitution that disables a president to run more than twice. They set it like that because George Washington was a two term president.
Funny how you debate so much with me, but you dont even know little things like these. | |
| | |
03-03-2005, 05:51 PM
|
#60 | | Scrum-Tiddly-Umptious
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: The STL
Posts: 5,678
|
Quote: Originally posted by Duffyboy
We need to get rid of the admin that's wrecking the country. Personally someone like Hillary is good enough to do that I feel. BTW, Who is the Republican to take over if the buggers sneak their way in again? Cheny? | Cheney won't run..he's getting up there in age, so I don't think the republicans will pick him..maybe Jeb? *dies laughing*
I wouldn't mind another Clinton in office. Things were so much simpler back then... | |
| | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:44 AM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0 | |
