Quote:
Originally posted by Britneyslave
That's true. But i really didn't want Britney to go with that trend and do really provacative photoshoots for rolling stone. I mean, if she didn't, would you have alot more respect for her! I sure as hell would. But yeah, your right. But it's still really bad though.  If she atleast wore pants or something, i would've actually probably like the picture. If she left her underwear just sit there, i would've probly liked it a little. But she just has to pull it down doesn't she.  oh well, it's just one picture. I'm just really hoping it's not the photo for the cover of the mag. |
Very true. But I don't know, I'm like...I see photoshoots all in the entertainment/performance aspect of the business. That's a thing she gets to play around with, since she doesn't dress like that every day. She's not the first to have shoots like that and she's definitely not the last. And yeah, it'd be nice to see a picture of her with like...barely any risqué-ness (?
) but I mean, what can you do. All the female artists I love and respect have done provacative photoshoots, so it's kind of a double standard with Britney. I'd love for her to have peoples' respect, but hopefully she'll get that for her MUSIC, which is more important anyway.
I've come to the realization all that matters to me is how
I view her and whatnot...she's always going to be criticized for SOMETHING, so all that matters to me is my opinion.