Quote:
Originally posted by RaInBoW_bRiTe
Are you serious? My point WAS if republicans were so confidant in winning they would have not launched the dirty campaign that they did against kerry. They ALSO did a dirty campaign against Clinton. Remember the entire scandal about him "trying pot once."? Well now they have Bush ON TAPE admitting he smoked dope, and no republicans are saying boo about it. Come on guys, you roasted Clinton alive. Are they really that hypocritical?
Yeah liberals have more bias. Yeah sure. There shouldn't BE a bias in any news station. I get mad with Rolling Stone because their articles are so obviously slanted to the left, that its frustrating. I get mad at Fox news because they are so up Bush's butt it's not funny. I want fair, reliable news. Is that so much to ask?
And having people like you who want a bias in their news is the reason why I can't get impartial news anywhere anymore. |
Well, Im not saying Bush never did crack. It was the 1960s, almost everyone did crack. You're right people shouldn't be attacked for admitting the truth. All that matters is that Clinton didn't lie about crack. It was stupid to attack him for telling the truth.
But liberals
dohave more bias. CNN, Mtv, Vh1, CBS, PBS, all of those stations are slanted to the left. Yes. Bias shouldn't exsist, but if you have Biased channels, we have the right to have them too. If you dont, then we shouldn't eaither.
Quote:
|
FOX News. Th station that effectively PUT BUSH IN POWER!
|
LMAO. You keep thinking that. You got that from Fahrenheight 911. In the begining.. wow.. you really like.. um.. worship that movie dont you.
.. wow..